Why Companies Kill Their Smartest People

This article is inspired by a valued colleague who was once called “corrosive”—simply because he pointed to an unsolved problem. A problem so deep it touched the very existence of his department. Instead of engaging, the leader’s only response was to demand more statistics. More micromanagement. More wasted hours, draining the team’s energy away from solving real issues.

---

Every company today can buy the same tools. Hardware, software, cloud platforms, AI models—you can swipe a credit card and have them by tomorrow morning. Access is no longer the differentiator.

So why do some companies fly while others crawl?

It’s not the tech. It’s the people—and how much freedom they’re given to use those tools smartly, with customers at the center.

Some teams make it look obvious in hindsight. They combine the same building blocks as everyone else, but the outcome feels inevitable, almost elegant. Others choke on the same resources, drowning in complexity, politics, and fear.

The deciding factor isn’t capital or code. It’s courage. The courage of the people inside to call things as they are, connect dots others ignore, and push ideas that feel uncomfortable.

And yet, those are the very people companies keep killing off.

The Death of the “Smart Ones”

It happens quietly. A manager feels threatened. A leader doesn’t like being challenged in front of the team. Someone labels a sharp colleague as “too much”—or worse, “corrosive”—because they’re willing to point out what’s broken instead of pleasing the boss.

So they don’t get hired. Or they get passed over. Or they’re shown the door.

In the short term, it feels like stability. Hierarchies remain intact. Egos stay unbruised. Everyone looks aligned in the meeting.

But underneath, the rot sets in.

• You lose adaptability.

• Competitors snap up the people you rejected.

• Your culture shifts toward safety, not smarts.

• Everyone else learns: don’t challenge, don’t question, don’t stick your neck out.

That’s how companies die—not because the market moved too fast, but because they clipped their own wings.

Case Study 1: Kodak’s Self-Sabotage

In 1975, a Kodak engineer named Steven Sasson built the first digital camera. He walked into the boardroom with a clunky prototype and a warning: This will disrupt film photography.

The executives dismissed it. Too threatening. Too disruptive to the core business. Sasson was told to keep quiet. Kodak doubled down on film.

By the time the market caught up, it was too late. Kodak had fired, sidelined, or silenced the very people who could have saved it.

The irony? They weren’t killed by competitors. They were killed by their own refusal to let smart people be “too much.”

Case Study 2: Nokia’s Blind Spot

In the mid-2000s, Nokia’s engineers warned leadership about the iPhone. They saw the risk, built working touchscreen prototypes, and raised alarms. But leadership felt untouchable.

Some of the smartest engineers left, frustrated by a culture that punished honesty. Within five years, Nokia’s market share collapsed from 50% to single digits.

Again, not because the tools weren’t there—but because the culture punished people who dared to say what others didn’t want to hear.

Case Study 3: The Netflix Way

Contrast that with Netflix. Their famous “culture deck” makes it clear: they want people who are “stunning colleagues.” Not safe, not compliant—stunning.

That means people who tell the truth, debate hard, and sometimes make leaders deeply uncomfortable. But instead of being fired for it, they’re rewarded. Netflix accepts the friction because it knows stagnation is worse than conflict.

The result? A company that reinvented itself multiple times, from DVDs to streaming to original content. The same tools were available to Blockbuster. But Netflix had the courage to keep their smart, brave people close.

Why Leaders Fear Them

Let’s be honest: “smart, corrosive” people are exhausting. They challenge your authority. They shine a light on weaknesses you’d rather ignore. They often don’t play by the unspoken rules of hierarchy.

And that feels dangerous—especially for middle managers who fear for their own relevance. So they rationalize the firing. Not a team player. Too aggressive. Doesn’t fit the culture.

Culture fit” is often just “Comfort fit.” And comfort is the slowest death in business.

The Hidden Costs of Killing Smart People

When you let your culture purge the smart ones, you pay three hidden taxes:

• Adaptability tax: You stop seeing risks early because nobody dares to raise them.

• Talent tax: The people you fire don’t vanish. They go to competitors.

• Culture tax: Everyone left learns that safety > honesty. You end up with mediocrity by design.

These taxes don’t hit the balance sheet immediately. But they compound, quarter after quarter, until the decline feels irreversible.

A Leadership Playbook

So what’s the alternative? How do you stop killing the smart ones while keeping the company functional?

Redefine “too much.” Being blunt or critical isn’t corrosive—it’s necessary. Separate toxic behavior from courageous truth-telling.

Reward discomfort. Celebrate the people who challenge your thinking. Signal to others that discomfort is fuel, not poison.

Protect dissenters. Make it clear that people who raise hard truths won’t be punished for it.

Audit your exits. Look at who’s leaving. If the smartest people are the ones walking out, the problem isn’t them—it’s you.

Build safety for bravery. Create an environment where calling out what’s broken is an act of loyalty, not betrayal.

The Final Question

The next time someone unsettles you in a meeting, pause before reaching for the eject button. Ask yourself:

• Is this person truly toxic—or just courageous?

• Am I protecting my ego, or protecting the company?

Because killing off the smart ones might keep you comfortable. But it guarantees your company stays cold.

And in business, stagnation isn’t just slow. It’s death.

---

PS: Stuck with this topic and need hands-on help?

You can book me for workshops, keynotes, or one-on-one sparring – Let’s talk.